Why couldn't he learn to speak hungarian better? Did he like goulash? Could he dance the csárdás? The farce was compounded by the occasional appearance of anonymous trolls who insisted that Liszt was, in fact, a slovak. Jeremy lin Is he American or American-born? With Chinese and taiwanese Chinese-taiwanese and AmericansMainland Chinese and taiwan Chinese real Chinese and Chinese who had forgotten their ancestors Freedom fighters and threat to humanity mao zedong worshippers and modern Chinese " Unionists " and " Independencrats " reviving arguments that once almost sabotaged.
My favourite season essay, essay, writings a academic
Cue the largest and most acrimonious war in recent memory! It was mercifully confined to the talk page, but what a talk page it was. What was Liszt's real name, franz or Ferenc? (It was actually Franciscus.) If online he was such a hungarian patriot, why didn't he fight in the war of independence in 1848? If he was really hungarian, why is his "Hungarian"-style music actually based on Gypsy music? If he really thought he was Hungarian, why did he spend so much time in France? Why couldn't he write better lyrics for the Kronungslied? What is the significance essay of the Chopin-esque left hand octaves in Funerailles, Octobre 1849? What event of October 1849 was he referring to, the crushing of the hungarian rebellion or the death of Chopin? Or was it the publication of heinrich heine's rude poem about him?
Ivana miličević but whence came this great beauty? Is she a "Bosnian actress of Croatian descent/ethnicity" or a "Croatian actress"? Should she be called American without sourcing because she's resided in America for nearly 30 years? Is she "Bosnian" because she was born in Sarajevo or "Bosnian-born" because bosnia did apple not exist as a nation when she was born there? Go ahead and edit the article and see how long your version lasts before someone reverts you! Jennifer Aniston Is she American or American-born? Does she need did Kiriakis mastermind the entire affair? Franz liszt Born in what was then Hungary but is now part of Austria to ethnic German parents whose families had lived in Hungary for a long time, and we had all thought it was common knowledge that Liszt claimed Hungary as his homeland and.
It appears that the dust has settled and the hungarian side won, but at the cost of nine citation numbers immediately after "Hungarian". Freddie mercury Freddie mercury halts a queen concert mid-show after an audience member disagrees with his ancestry. There was a feud that was going on for a long time on this one concerning Freddie mercury's true ancestry. Is he the most famous Iranian rock star? You'd be surprised how many people get this annoyed, to the point that it is still a hotly contested item over there. Just one example can be seen here. Oh, and this one, like all the others, had its share of random vandals, people leaving unmarked anonymous insults, and gnashing of teeth. Let's just say for now he's a parsi whose parents originated from India! Just don't even think of suggesting he's "left" queen or is an "ex-member" of the band, though, or you'll really get people's hackles.
My favourite season essay - selfguidedlife
Students of law can argue the finer points of jus sanguinis and jus soli. The use of "Polish-born" is branded as a racist slur. There is spirited debate about whether the citing of a passage of law is considered original research, tantamount to "dropping Mentos into a bottle of Pepsi to see if it will explode." Can you emigrate from a country of which you are not a citizen? Can you receive citizenship if you already have it? The possibilities for intensive study are endless. Celebrity witnesses such as Obama, churchill, sean Taro Ono lennon, and. Seuss are pressed into making appearances.
Collateral damage even reaches WP:Lame, where the Chopin entry is removed because of an alleged lack of lameness. And then there are the trolls. Even Chopin's remains are divided. The body rests in Paris, the heart in Warsaw. Ányos Jedlik he is considered by both Hungarians and Slovaks to be the unsung father of the dynamo and electric motor. But what was his true ethnicity, hungarian or Slovak? 1 At one point, the score in this heated battle was 16 citations to 4 in favour of the hungarian side, with the Slovak side being harvard handed both dubious and verify source tags.
If one version was more or less accepted afterwards, it's ok to note that, but the fact that an edit war occurred means that neither side was "in the right all along". If you feel that an edit war was truly lame, add it! You don't need to ask on the talk page. The lameness of it should speak for itself. Of course, editors with a more experienced eye for lameness may disagree with your claim to the "lamest which may just result in yet another lame edit war! Note that the no original research and verifiability policies are meant to apply to the article namespace, not necessarily on pages like this in the wikipedia (project) namespace.
This is intended for the community rather than your average readers. Humorous, insightful commentary is encouraged here. Ethnic and national feuds main page: wikipedia:Lamest edit wars/Ethnic feuds people Chopin Was Chopin Polish, French, polishFrench, or FrenchPolish? For years, there has been a low-level (and at times high-intensity) conflict about which country can claim Chopin as its son. Or was it szopen? The observer learns a lot about the napoleonic code, about the nuances of "citizenship "nationality and "ethnicity".
One day in rain essay in marathi tolerated slums
Note that pithy"s on talk pages may be suitable for pdf wikipedia:Talk page highlights. It should truly be amongst the lamest edit wars. Not just garden-variety lame. Unless a participant is banned for their part in the edit war, do not give the names of participants or link to their userpages. People have lapses in judgment, and some end up edit warring; they shouldn't, however, be stuck with database that for the rest of their on-wiki careers for no reason. This is absolutely not the place for harping over someone's past editing. Be careful to avoid even the semblance of taking sides in the war.
stating the discussion is lame is frequently not sufficient; every opposing statement must be denied with increasingly vehement assertions of the lameness. While at first blush, wasting time whining about what a waste of time something is may seem illogical, the inherent irony just magnifies the lameness. An additional step to increase lameness is to include repeated links to this essay, which is, wP:lame. Administrators have a special role to play; proposing/implementing topic bans on lame participants is doubly effective: it not only increases the present-day lameness, but, by quashing debate, helps ensure the lame issue remains unsolved for future generations of wikipedians to go on about. The best way to set about a lame edit war is to change a large number of articles based on your interpretation of minutiae in the manual of style. If this does not work, try changing the mos itself; that always works. Guidelines on how to add an entry to this guide If you want to add a "lame edit war" to this page, keep the following in mind: It must have been an actual edit war. Discussions on talk pages, even over trivially lame details, are not "edit wars" and should never be added: we want to encourage such rational debates between users/viewpoints (as opposed to actual edit warring).
Truly, the revolutionary, wikipedia outlook has changed the way things get done. It has changed them from actually getting done to never shredder getting done. On the other hand, nobody gets dispatched (so far!). Guidelines on how to create lameness. Some discussions are born lame; some achieve lameness; some have lameness thrust upon them. Upon coming across a discussion that is borderline lame, some wikipedians may be tempted to go do something useful. This is a big mistake. Left to its own devices, the discussion might inadvertently become useful. What's the fun in that?
Essays Online Students, marathi
An unidentified clerk (centre) tries to bring an end to a great edit war involving dozens of respected editors. At her feet, three bewildered newcomers are seen caught in the middle of the dispute. Occasionally, even experienced, wikipedians lose their heads and apple devote every waking moment to edit warring over the most trivial thing, wasting time debating topics of no practical value, or wrestling over questions whose answers hold no practical consequence. This page documents our lamest examples. It isn't comprehensive or authoritative, but it serves as a showcase of situations where people lose sight of the big picture and obsessively expend huge amounts of energy fighting over something that, in the end, isn't really so important. Edit warring is believed by some to be important, possibly due to the historical regularity and frequency of the occurrence of these wars. A careful and scholarly study of available archeological evidence has even suggested that edit wars may have recurred on a regular basis going back all the way to the beginning of recorded history, even before the advent of proper writing circa 2001. In some earlier instances of edit warring, dating back from before the good old days, participants would simply utilize their swords and fight a battle, or later, their guns and fight a duel. In modern times, physical combat has been outlawed and replaced by the careful inciting of personal attacks, strategic 3RR templating and canvassing, timely notices on, wP:AN/i, and (in some cases) marking the changes as a minor edit.